How does co-viewing affect TV advertising?
New abilities to measure co-viewing (e.g., TVision’s Presence measure) have prompted questions about whether co-viewed ads should be valued differently from solo-viewed ads.
Read more
Key Question: How does eyes on screen vary across media?
Advertisers make media decisions based on reach data (e.g., ratings, impressions) and performance data (e.g., clicks). But little is known about how media and devices differ in how long viewers look at ads. Eye-tracking results compare eyes on screen across media on different devices.
Read more
Key Question: How effective are social media ads combined with TV ads?
Advertisers use social media advertising to extend reach beyond TV advertising, or to increase frequency. Frequency across media can have synergy effects. Sometimes synergy only occurs when two media are seen in a specific sequence (e.g., TV first). This lab study tested whether sequential synergy occurs when social media and TV ads are combined. It also compared the relative effectiveness of social media ads with normal TV ads, seen once or repeated.
Read more
Key Question: Do brands need to create new ads during a crisis?
During the COVID-19 crisis, brands could continue to use standard ads, or create new ads tailored to the crisis. Potentially, COVID-19 ads were more effective than standard ads, because they were more relevant to consumers at that time. During the crisis, more people were watching news, to get the latest information about COVID-19. Did COVID-19 ads that were informational, rather than emotional, perform better in this informational news context? This in-home study was conducted in April 2020, at the height of the pandemic in the United States.
Read more
Key Question: Are PiP ads more effective than normal TV ads?
Viewers have become used to ad breaks interrupting ad-supported video content (e.g., broadcast TV). To combat ad avoidance, however, advertisers are moving ads from these breaks into programs, using product placement and sponsorship. Another way of advertising during programs was investigated in this study, by showing commercials in a picture-in-picture (PiP) window.
Many TV programs already show additional content in a PiP window, during lulls in the content (e.g., during the end credits). This study investigated the potential of showing ads in a PiP window during programs, and comparing the effects PiP ads with non-PIP ads when viewers could avoid the non-PIP ads by fast-forwarding or by looking at their personal smartphone. PiP ads may be less effective than normal TV ads because of their smaller size, and competition from other content on the screen (and in the soundtrack). But PiP ads may be more effective than normal TV ads because they are harder to avoid (by changing the channel, or fast-forwarding, or by looking at content on another screen (e.g., a smartphone)).
Read more
A video advertisement stands more chance to be viewed in its entirety in some media, with cinema and online being at opposite ends of the spectrum, and TV being somewhere in the middle. It makes sense for advertisers to consider viewing time in assessing and valuing media choices. Yet research shows that 100% complete exposure is not worth double that of viewing an advertisement for half of its duration, i.e., viewing time has diminishing returns, implying that effectiveness near equivalent to a 100% complete exposure could be achieved by a lower threshold.
Read more
Key Question: What are the effects of overlaying extra branding onto video ads?
Networks could overlay extra branding throughout video ads, a practice called “omnipresent branding”.
Prior research shows that branding early and often, rather than branding duration, is what improves ad- effectiveness measured by brand-association.
Omnipresent branding could be valuable for ads that are skipped before the ad’s first branding scene.
This study compares the effects of static and dynamic (animated) omnipresent branding with normal control ads, seen on a television or on a smartphone.
Read more
Dedicated devices, such as AppleTV, can access internet TV services and stream them to TV or projectors.
Streaming devices make it easier for “cord cutters” to replace expensive premium cable options with cheaper subscription services like Netflix, and replace standard cable packages with free, commercial-supported TV from sources like Hulu.
This study investigates how internet TV device owners use them, by testing the usability of a selection of 20 typical tasks, such as watching movies or catchup TV, listening to music, and downloading apps.
These tasks were performed on four popular devices from Apple, Roku, Amazon, and Xbox.
Read more
Consumers are increasingly watching short videos online, on sites such as YouTube. These short videos are often preceded by pre-roll ads, which viewers can skip after 3 seconds. Now, very short ads (6-seconds) are replacing 15-second ads as the leading short-duration video ad format, online and on broadcast TV. This study compares 15-second ads with ads half their duration (7-seconds), on TV and on mobile phones.
The results show that 7-second ads are just as effective as 15-second ads on memory, ad liking and biometrics. 7-second ads are alternatives to 15-second ads as reminders of previous longer exposures.
Read more
Together with CNBC the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute has released a white paper on multi-platform media synergy.
Read more