Ehrenberg-BassSponsor Website  
    University of South Australia Ehrenberg-Bass Institute for Marketing Science University of South Australia Ehrenberg-Bass Institute for Marketing Science
Log Out
  • Home
  • Online Courses
    • Mining Panel Data for Insights
    • Six Simple Steps of Data Reduction
  • Ask us a Question
  • Buy Books
  • Additional Services
    • Specialist Research Services
    • How Brands Grow – Live!
    • Other Collaborations
  • Podcast Interviews
Ehrenberg-Bass Institute for Marketing Science

Ehrenberg-BassSponsor Website

Select a category
Search
  • All Categories
  • All Categories
  • # Latest Research
  • Advertising
  • Best Practice
  • Beyond :30
  • Brand Building & Growth
  • Brand Competition
  • ad spend
  • Budgeting
  • Business-to-Business (B2B)
  • Category Entry Points
  • Category Growth
  • Buyer Behaviour
  • Consumer Behaviour
  • Market Research
  • Data Presentation & Method
  • Distinctiveness & Distinctive Assets
  • Double Jeopardy
  • Durables
  • Emerging Markets
  • Innovation
  • Light & Heavy Buyers
  • Loyalty & Defection
  • Loyalty Programs
  • Luxury Brands
  • Marketing Myths
  • Media Decisions
  • Mental Availability & Salience
  • digital
  • Online
  • Packaging Design
  • Pareto Share
  • Penetration and Brand Metrics
  • Physical Availability
  • Portfolio Management
  • Price Promotions & Discounting
  • Pricing Decisions
  • Private Labels
  • qotw
  • Question of the Week
  • Coronavirus
  • Virus
  • Covid
  • COV19
  • COV-19
  • Recessions
  • Segmentation & Targeting
  • Services & Service Quality
  • Shopper Behaviour
  • social marketing
  • Social Cause Marketing
  • Social Media
  • Television
  • Word-of-Mouth

Mining Panel Data for Insights

About the Course

This online learning module is for brand or product managers, and people commencing in a CMI (Customer / Market Insights) role. Experienced analysts have probably learned much of these ideas from years on the job. The course explains and imparts simple yet powerful ways to get a useful ‘story’ out of your panel data, how to know what to expect, and how to communicate what you’ve found to colleagues.

Next Page

Introduction

Welcome to the Mining Panel Data for Insights course. The Ehrenberg-Bass Institute has developed this online learning tool as a step-by-step guide to help you get the most out of household panel data. There are three sections. You can work through them one-by-one or click on the links below to go directly to a particular section.

  1. Understanding the key Brand Performance Metrics
  2. Tips to organise your data
  3. What to expect from your panel buying data

There are examples and exercises to help you along the way. You will need to download this Excel spreadsheet to use while you are completing the course. Let’s get started!

Contact for questions: info@marketingscience.info.

Previous Page
Next Page

Section 1 – Understanding the Key Brand Performance Metrics (BPMs)

This section of the course will help you to understand the Brand Performance Metrics (BPMs) you will be working with. We’ll cover which BPMs are important, how to calculate each metric and how to interpret the results. We’ll start with market share.

 

Market Share

Market Share is defined as the total category sales that are devoted to a particular brand. It can be measured in terms of units sold, volume or price paid. This is an example of how to calculate Market Share:

 

Market Share = (units of a brand sold ÷ total units of the product category sold) x 100

Note: For purchase metrics such as market share, the time frame for analysis is typically one year.
Note: Market share can also be calculated using volume or $.

 

Now let’s do some calculations.  Below is a table of raw data with the deodorant units sold over one year. Each row records all the purchases made by a particular household. For example, Household 1 made 12 purchases during the year, divided between Fresh Breeze (5), Quartet (3), Sphynx (2) and Sensi-Mate (2). Using the table below (which is also in the spreadsheet) we will do some market share calculations.

Practice Questions

Use the formula provided to calculate market share for Ulti-Mate. Click to reveal the answer.    

The answer is 37%. Ulti-Mate has 37% of the overall deodorant category sales, making it the largest brand in the category. To calculate Market Share for Ulti-Mate, you take its units sold, which is 41, and divide that by the total units of the product category, which is 111. So (41 ÷ 111) × 100 = 37.

Now calculate the market share for the other brands. Round answers to a whole figure e.g. 52 not 51.6. Click to reveal the answer.    
  • Fresh Breeze = 18%
  • Quartet = 24%
  • Sphynx = 14%
  • Sensi-Mate = 6%

Table 1: Deodorant buying (year) - purchase occasions

HouseholdFresh BreezeQuartetUlti-MateSphynxSensi-MateTotal
1532212
2112
32651216
40
5426
622
7347
83126
912328
102125
1121339
1233
13246
14224
1511
161348
1744
1822
1933
2013217
Total202741167111
Previous Page
Next Page

Brand Penetration

The penetration of a brand is the proportion of household buyers (the total number of households that have bought from the category) that have purchased the brand at least once during a specified time period.

For example, if there are 1 million households and 100,000 bought your deodorant at least once in the past year, your brand’s penetration would be 10%. You can calculate penetration using the formula below.

You may be familiar with the term “% buying”. Throughout the toolkit we refer to “% buying” as penetration.

 

Penetration = (number of household buyers ÷ number of total households) x 100

Note: The longer the time period, the higher the brand’s penetration will become.
Tip: Before you can calculate penetration, you first need to work out how many buyers a brand has.

Practice Questions

Using the same table (below), calculate penetration for Ulti-Mate. Click to reveal the answer.    

The answer is 70%. 70% of the population has purchased Ulti-Mate at least once in the given time period.

Ulti-Mate has 14 household buyers and there are 20 households in total in the data. So, (14 ÷ 20) × 100 = 70%

Now calculate penetration for all remaining brands. Click to reveal the answer.    
  • Fresh Breeze = 45%
  • Quartet = 60%
  • Sphynx = 35%
  • Sensi-Mate = 20%
Why is the ‘total’ penetration for the market greater than 100%? Click to reveal the answer.    

Adding each brand’s penetration, you find the total is 235. This is because households typically buy multiple brands from the same category. The set of brands that households buy from a category is referred to as a repertoire.

Table 1: Deodorant buying (year) - purchase occasions

HouseholdFresh BreezeQuartetUlti-MateSphynxSensi-MateTotal
1532212
2112
32651216
40
5426
622
7347
83126
912328
102125
1121339
1233
13246
14224
1511
161348
1744
1822
1933
2013217
Total202741167111
Previous Page
Next Page

Purchase Rate

The Purchase Rate is the average number of times households who bought the brand did so in the given time period.

 

Purchase Rate = total sum of household purchases ÷ number of household purchases

Note: Purchase Rate also increases when the time frame is extended, but at a slower rate than penetration.
Note: For Penetration we normally round to a whole figure. For Purchase Rate it is customary to round to one decimal point.
Tip: We exclude those households who did not buy the brand at all in this calculation.

Practice Questions

What is the purchase rate for Ulti-Mate? Round to one decimal point.    

Ulti-Mate was purchased 41 times in total and it has 14 household buyers. So, 41 ÷ 14 = 2.9. Ulti-Mate household buyers have bought it, on average, 2.9 times in the given time period.

Calculate the purchase rate for all other brands. Round to one decimal point.    
  • Fresh Breeze = 2.2
  • Quartet = 2.3
  • Sphynx = 2.3
  • Sensi-Mate = 1.8

Table 1: Deodorant buying (year) - purchase occasions

HouseholdFresh BreezeQuartetUlti-MateSphynxSensi-MateTotal
1532212
2112
32651216
40
5426
622
7347
83126
912328
102125
1121339
1233
13246
14224
1511
161348
1744
1822
1933
2013217
Total202741167111
Previous Page
Next Page

Share of Category Requirements (SCR)

Share of Category Requirements (SCR) is the proportion of a household’s total purchases from the category devoted to one particular brand. This is reported as a percentage. The average of all the individual household SCRs is the brand’s share of category requirements. You can calculate the SCR for any household by using the following formula:

SCR = Household’s purchases of a brand ÷ Household’s total number of category purchases

 

For example, let’s look at Household 1.

Table 2: Household 1

HouseholdFresh BreezeQuartetUlti-MateSphynxSensi-MateTotal
15302212

Household 1 purchased from the category 12 times in total. These 12 category purchases were split between four brands, Fresh Breeze, Quartet, Sphynx and Sensi-Mate. So for Household 1 we need to work out the SCR for each of these four brands.

Tip: The SCR for all 4 brands should add up to 100% or very close (with rounding)

 

Table 3: Deodorant buying (year) - SCR calculated for household 1

HouseholdFresh BreezeQuartetUlti-MateSphynxSensi-MateTotal
15302212
SCR(5/12)*100 = 42(3/12)*100 = 25(0/12)*100 = 0(2/12)*100 = 17(2/12)*100 = 17100

Let’s take a look at another example. Household 16 purchased from the category 8 times. These 8 category purchases were split between three brands, Quartet, Ulti-Mate and Sphynx.

Table 4: Household 16

HouseholdFresh BreezeQuartetUlti-MateSphynxSensi-MateTotal
15013408

We need to work out the SCR for these three brands.

Table 5: Deodorant buying (year) - SCR calculated for household 16

HouseholdFresh BreezeQuartetUlti-MateSphynxSensi-MateTotal
15013408
SCR(0/8)*100 = 0(1/8)*100 = 12.5(3/8)*100 = 37.5(4/8)*100 = 50(0/8)*100 = 0100

Can you do this analysis for all households and all brands in the table contained in the spreadsheet ‘Table 1 for SCR calculations’? After you have done this, then go to the next page to see what the table should look like.

Previous Page
Next Page

Table 6: Deodorant buying (year) – SCR for all households

HouseholdFresh BreezeQuartetUlti-MateSphynxSensi-MateTotal
1422501717100
20505000100
3133831613100
4000000
50067033100
61000000100
74305700100
850173300100
9132538250100
1004020400100
11221133330100
120100000100
130336700100
140050500100
151000000100
1601338500100
170010000100
180100000100
190010000100
20144329014100

Now to calculate loyalty for each brand, you simply take an average across all household buyers who have a greater than zero SCR for that brand.

Tip: The average should be based only on those households who buy the brand at all. You might find it easier to delete the zeros and then use the averages of each column to calculate the average SCR.

Practice Questions

What is the average SCR for Ulti-Mate?    

The correct answer is 51%. To calculate SCR for Ulti-Mate you need to sum the Ulti-Mate column (712) and divide this by the number of household buyers for the brand (14), therefore, 712/14=51%.

Now calculate SCR for all remaining brands.    
  • Fresh Breeze = 44%
  • Quartet = 41%
  • Sphynx = 32%
  • Sensi-Mate = 19%
What does this tell us about Ulti-Mate’s customers’ loyalty?    

Ulti-Mate satisfies just over half (51%) of all category needs. The other 46% are satisfied by other brands in the category. Households that buy Ulti-Mate are not 100% loyal to this brand, they also buy the other brands occasionally, otherwise loyalty for Ulti-Mate would be 100%. This is lower than 100% as SCR is a natural consequence of repertoire buying.

Note: The set of brands a household buys is referred to as a repertoire.
Previous Page
Next Page

Exclusive or 100% Loyalty measures the proportion of a brand’s household buyers that only buy that one brand in the time period. It is reported as a percentage of the brand’s customer base.

 

Exclusive or 100% Loyalty = (number of household buyers who did not purchase any other brand ÷ number of household buyers of that brand) x 100

Practice Questions

Work out the proportion of exclusive or 100% loyalty for Quartet.    

17% of Quartet’s household buyers only bought Quartet in the given time period. Out of Quartet’s 12 buyers, 2 buyers had only purchased that brand. So, (2 ÷ 12) × 100 = 17.

Now calculate exclusive or 100% loyalty for all remaining brands.    
  • Fresh Breeze = 22%
  • Ulti-Mate = 14%
  • Sphynx = 0%
  • Sensi-Mate = 0%
Previous Page
Next Page

That’s it for section 1.

You should now know how Market Share, Penetration, Purchase Rate, Share of Category Requirements and % of Exclusive or 100% Loyals are calculated. These are Brand Performance Metrics that we commonly work with. Often, these will come already calculated for you. The next step is about gaining insights from a set of BPM’s across all brands in a category.

Previous Page
Next Page

Section 2 – Tips to organise your data

This section of the toolkit will help you turn “raw” data into meaningful information. You will learn how to see patterns that exist in panel data, identify exceptions and learn how to easily communicate the key points to others.

 

Why do we need these principles?

It’s all about managing your data. We usually start with a large amount of raw data in an excel spreadsheet.  It’s often very hard to gain an initial sense of what data could tell you. Given how busy we all are, and how little time we have, learning to organise your data so that everyone can quickly see the key points, is immensely useful. And your colleagues will thank you! Applying these principles will also make it easier to compare results across markets. It becomes much easier to interpret the data by following some simple rules to guide table layout and presentation.

 

There are six simple rules to follow:

  1. Remove % signs from the table body
  2. Round to two effective digits
  3. Order brands by size
  4. Add averages to aid comparisons
  5. Use table layout to guide the eye
  6. Provide a brief verbal summary
Previous Page
Next Page

Step 1 – Remove % signs from the table body

Having % signs in the body of a table can make it difficult for the eye to spot patterns. To minimise clutter, remove % signs from the body and place them in column headings.

Before removing the % signs the table looks like this:

BrandsPenetration (%)Purchase Rate (%)SCR (%)
Sphynx Spray34.32%2.481%17.848%
Sphynx Roll-on52.89%2.724%19.876%
Ulti-Mate 2422.30%1.997%15.897%
Ulti-Mate Ultra54.34%3.011%22.132%
Natura18.20%1.932%13.212%
Scandina57.76%3.826%23.902%
Scandina Ultra24.90%2.332%15.002%
Scandina Sensitive45.50%2.879%21.342%

This is what the table looks like without the % signs:

BrandsPenetration (%)Purchase Rate (%)SCR (%)
Sphynx Spray34.322.48117.848
Sphynx Roll-on52.892.72419.876
Ulti-Mate 2422.301.99715.897
Ulti-Mate Ultra54.343.01122.132
Natura18.201.93213.212
Scandina57.763.82623.902
Scandina Ultra24.902.33215.002
Scandina Sensitive45.502.87921.342
Previous Page
Next Page

Step 2 – Round to two meaningful digits

Rounding to two meaningful digits simply means taking a number such as 23.43% and rounding it to 23%. Numbers rounded to two meaningful digits are much easier to read and remember than the longer ones. This is what the table looks like after rounding.

Table 3: Brand performance metrics (after rounding)

BrandsPenetration (%)Purchase RateSCR (%)
Sphynx Spray342.518
Sphynx Roll-on532.720
Ulti-Mate 24222.016
Ulti-Mate Ultra543.022
Natura181.913
Scandina583.824
Scandina Ultra252.315
Scandina Sensitive462.921
Previous Page
Next Page

Step 3 – Order brand by size

The second step is to order your table by size. This is a simple, but often neglected step in the synthesis of buyer behaviour data. For example, data is often presented to clients in alphabetical order, or the order that the brands feature in the questionnaire. Rarely does this type of ordering give us any useful information. And sometimes it can steer us in the wrong direction. Here’s a table where the brands are ordered alphabetically. It’s hard to come to any conclusion about how the metrics are related to each other.

Table 4: Brand performance metrics (ordered alphabetically)

BrandsPenetration (%)Purchase RateSCR (%)
Natura181.913
Scandina583.824
Scandina Sensitive462.921
Scandina Ultra252.315
Sphynx Roll-on532.720
Sphynx Spray342.518
Ulti-Mate 24222.016
Ulti-Mate Ultra543.022

Now let’s look at the same data, but where the table has been re-sorted to present brands by penetration. Now we can start to see a relationship between the metrics. For example, can you see that brands with higher penetration also tend to have higher purchase rates and SCR.

Table 5: Brand performance metrics (ordered by size)

BrandsPenetration (%)Purchase RateSCR (%)
Scandina583.824
Ulti-Mate Ultra543.022
Sphynx Roll-on532.720
Scandina Sensitive462.921
Sphynx Spray342.518
Scandina Ultra252.315
Ulti-Mate 24222.016
Natura181.913
Previous Page
Next Page

Step 4 – Add averages to aid comparisons

Averages are useful as a basis to compare across brands. You can quickly see when a brand scores higher or lower than most other brands. In the last table (without averages), its hard to get a sense of how the brands vary on each of the metrics. After adding the averages, we can more clearly compare and see that the large share brands have higher penetration, purchase rate and SCR.

Table 6: Brand performance metrics (with averages included)

BrandsPenetration (%)Purchase RateSCR (%)
Scandina583.824
Ulti-Mate Ultra543.022
Sphynx Roll-on532.720
Scandina Sensitive462.921
Sphynx Spray342.518
Scandina Ultra252.315
Ulti-Mate 24222.016
Natura181.913
Average392.719
Previous Page
Next Page

Practice Question

Go to the “Table for data reduction” sheet on the Excel workbook (which you may have already downloaded). You will also see the table below.

Can you convert this table into a more user-friendly format, using the steps we have outlined?

  • Step 1 – Remove all % signs from the table body
  • Step 2 – Round to two meaningful digits
  • Step 3 – Order brands by size (in this case, size is penetration, which can stand in for market share in our example)
  • Step 4 – Add averages

Make as many changes as you can in your Excel spreadsheet before continuing to the next page to view the re-formatted table.

Table 7: Brand performance metrics (raw data)

BrandsPenetrationPurchase RateSCR
Sphynx Spray32.33%2.43417.34%
Sphynx Cologne4.24%1.4988.12%
Sphynx Roll-on52.34%3.42124.00%
Sphynx Sensitive7.11%1.5549.02%
Ray-Dry56.76%3.57821.11%
Ray-Sensitive4.21%1.4767.43%
Ray-Green4.45%1.5118.23%
Ray-Max Protection4.32%1.7439.00%
Ray-Max Protection 243.68%1.4317.69%
Sensi-Mate4.00%1.8217.90%
Ulti-Mate 2439.90%3.10221.99%
Ulti-Mate Ultra56.99%3.23422.33%
Ulti-Mate Care+5.43%1.5218.43%
Natura9.00%2.23213.80%
Emblem8.79%2.94315.22%
Alpine3.79%2.0017.30%
Scandina57.13%3.91124.34%
Scandina Ultra27.24%2.11113.22%
Scandina Verde3.42%1.3137.00%
Scandina Sensitive33.77%2.76814.68%
Scandina Arctic23.21%1.79810.00%
Scandina Marine4.00%1.5127.68%
Previous Page
Next Page

Table 8: Brand performance metrics (rules of table presentation applied)

BrandsPenetration (%)Purchase RateSCR (%)
Scandina573.924
Ulti-Mate Ultra573.222
Ray-Dry573.621
Sphynx Roll-on523.424
Ulti-Mate 24403.122
Scandina Sensitive342.815
Sphynx Spray322.417
Scandina Ultra272.113
Scandina Arctic231.811
Natura92.214
Emblem92.915
Sphynx Sensitive71.59
Ulti-Mate Care+51.58
Ray-Green41.58
Ray-Max Protection41.79
Sphynx Cologne41.58
Ray-Sensitive41.47
Sensi-Mate41.88
Scandina Marine41.58
Alpine42.07
Ray-Max Protection 2441.48
Scandina Verde31.37
Average202.213

Practice Question

Does the Double Jeopardy pattern occur in this data?    

Yes. You should be able to see that the larger penetration brands have slightly higher purchase rate or SCR than smaller penetration brands. For example Scandina, Ulti-Mate Ultra and Ray-Dry have a higher purchase rate or SCR than Alpine, Ray-Max Protection 24 and Scandina Verde. You should also be able to see some deviations.  For example, Alpine has a slightly higher purchase rate than we would expect for a brand of its size.  Whereas Ulti-Mate Ultra has a slightly lower purchase rate compared to other brands of similar penetration levels. This is the power of laws like Double Jeopardy, they give us guidelines about what to expect and help us spot deviations more easily. But this is only possible if we follow the steps outlined here. If you go back to the raw table, you would find it hard to draw these same conclusions. Go to the next screen to see a list of common sources of deviations…

Previous Page
Next Page

Common types of deviations

There are two types of deviations:

Niche brands — What looks like excess loyalty, where a brand has higher loyalty than would be expected given its market share.

Change of pace brands — What looks like a deficit in loyalty, where a brand has lower loyalty than would be expected given its market share.

 

Reasons for Deviations

These are the key reasons that we have found for deviations. As we discover more reasons we will update these lists:

 

Niche Brands

  • Brands with limited distribution (eg, Private label or retailer brands or brands that are sold in a limited geographical area).
  • Brands that are functionally different (eg, Diet soft drinks) such that some people do not consider them.

 

Brands used in limited situations

  • Brands that only suit one purchase occasion (eg, a chocolate product only used at Easter which limits the number of times it’s bought).

 

Deviations will be explained more in section 3.

Practice Question

Look at the table again (below). What does this tell you about how much brands vary in penetration versus the loyalty metrics of purchase rate or SCR?    

If you compare the brands at the top with those at the bottom, we can see that the % buying can vary 20 fold (3% versus 59%); while the loyalty metrics vary 3-4 fold. Therefore the biggest difference between brands is in the penetration they have. This tells us that to become a larger share brand, you need to gain lots more customers, who will buy you slightly more often. For more on this see Ehrenberg-Bass Institute report #31 How Brands Grow.

Table 8: Brand performance metrics (rules of table presentation applied)

BrandsPenetration (%)Purchase RateSCR (%)
Scandina573.924
Ulti-Mate Ultra573.222
Ray-Dry573.621
Sphynx Roll-on523.424
Ulti-Mate 24403.122
Scandina Sensitive342.815
Sphynx Spray322.417
Scandina Ultra272.113
Scandina Arctic231.811
Natura92.214
Emblem92.915
Sphynx Sensitive71.59
Ulti-Mate Care+51.58
Ray-Green41.58
Ray-Max Protection41.79
Sphynx Cologne41.58
Ray-Sensitive41.47
Sensi-Mate41.88
Scandina Marine41.58
Alpine42.07
Ray-Max Protection 2441.48
Scandina Verde31.37
Average202.213
Previous Page
Next Page

Organising your data for reports & presentations

For reports and presentations you can make some further improvements to the data layout. Here are some steps for this. To do this section, you need to open up Microsoft Word or Powerpoint – whichever program you use most often to communicate results to others.

Step 5: Use table layout to guide the eye

Use row and column lines in the table to guide the eye. This removes clutter and makes it easier for your eye to focus on, and compare the numbers. Three steps to help you improve how you present data are:

  1. Remove any unnecessary table lines (horizontal or vertical) – only keep the ones that guide the eye to look down columns or across rows as necessary
  2. Use bold lettering where appropriate (column titles, totals, averages)
  3. Table text should have smaller typeface to other written text
Note: we have only used the top eight brands to demonstrate.

 

Before applying table layout rules our table looks like this:

Table 9: Brand performance metrics

Screen Shot 2016-05-23 at 11.50.18 AM

 

After applying table layout rules it should look like this:

Table 10: Brand performance metrics (lines removed, some lettering bolded)

Screen Shot 2016-05-23 at 11.50.33 AM

 

Note: We have avoided using too much space between the rows. Unnecessary space distracts the eye from seeing the pattern and relationship between the numbers.
Previous Page
Next Page

Step 6: Provide a brief verbal story

A story
is a brief, one sentence description of the key point of the table. It should provide the reader with the key takeout of the table.

Table 11: Brand performance metrics (with brief story included)

Screen Shot 2016-05-23 at 11.50.33 AM

Smaller brands have lower loyalty than larger brands

 

You can try this for yourself by taking the table of data and putting it into a word document or a Powerpoint presentation. You will immediately see the difference! Your table should now look something like this…

Table 12: Brand performance metrics (all table presentation rules applied)

Screen Shot 2016-05-23 at 1.09.26 PM

Brands vary much more in penetration than in purchase rate or SCR

Previous Page
Next Page

Section 3 – What to expect from your panel data

What should your panel data look like?

Once tables have been presented in line with the guidelines you have just worked through, it becomes easier to spot patterns in the data. You will have noticed that when brands are sorted by size, loyalty measures move in line with penetration. We also find that these measures move in line with market share. As we know what to expect, we can easily spot deviations. Deviations are important as they suggest something interesting might be going on with a brand. They give us direction as to where to dig deeper in the data.

This approach can be done at either Total corporate, Parent brand, or Sub-brand levels but it is best not to mix up the levels of brands.  It is important to make sure there is no “double counting” in the list of brands.

Identifying and spotting deviations

A deviation is where a result is not following the expected pattern. It is where a brand is performing better or worse than expected on a BPM for its size in the market. Let’s take a closer look at the BPMs to see the expected patterns and do some deviation spotting.

Note: Click here to for an explanation of common types of deviations.

Market Share and Brand Penetration (% buying)

Let’s start by looking at the expected patterns between Market Share and Penetration. We expect to see market share moving in line with penetration, i.e. as market share decreases, penetration also decreases.

Table 13: Market share and penetration

BrandsMarket SharePenetration
Ulti-Mate 241459
Scandina1357
Ulti-Mate Ultra1357
Ray-Dry1357
Sphynx Roll-on1252
Sphynx Spray632
Scandina Sensitive534
Scandina Ultra427
Scandina Arctic336
Emblem19
Sensi-Mate14
Natura19
Sphynx Sensitive17
Ulti-Mate Care+15
Ray-Max Protection14
Ray-Max Protection 2414
Scandina Marine14
Ray-Green14
Ray-Sensitive0.54
Sphynx Cologne0.44
Average-19

Practice Questions

Do all brands in the table above follow the expected pattern?    

No. Not all brands in the table follow the expected pattern. For example, Scandina Arctic is deviating from the expected pattern. Its penetration is higher than expected for a brand of its size.

Which brands do you think are deviations? (Note: there may be more than one correct answer)    

Scandina Arctic (STR) is deviating from the expected pattern. Its penetration is higher than expected for a brand of its size. It is possible that Sphynx Spray, Scandina Sensitive, Sensi-Mate are deviations, but these are are small deviations.

Previous Page
Next Page

Brand Penetration and Purchase Rate

The next relationship we can expect to see is that of Double Jeopardy. Remember, the Double Jeopardy pattern says that smaller share brands have a lower level of penetration and purchase rate than their larger share counterparts. Look at the data in this table.

Table14: Penetration & purchase rate – Southern District

BrandsPenetrationPurchase Rate
Chef632.8
Ulti-Mate562.5
Accent-Zed542.6
Azzuri322.2
Scandina+252
Mayday191.7
CPC131.7
Honeydew101.8
Acacia91.6
Glisten41.5
Average292

Practice Questions

Is there a Double Jeopardy pattern in the table?    

Yes. Brands with bigger penetration have higher purchase rates than brands with smaller penetration.

Can you identify any deviations from the Double Jeopardy pattern?    

Ulti-Mate’s purchase rate is slightly lower than expected for a brand of its size.

Accent-Zed, and Honeydew have a slightly higher purchase rate than expected.

 

Previous Page
Next Page

Penetration and SCR

We also expect to see a Double Jeopardy pattern when comparing penetration and SCR. Look at the table below.

To recap again, the smaller share brands have a lower level of penetration and also SCR than their larger share counterparts.

Table 15: Penetration & SCR

BrandsPenetrationSCR (%)
Chef6327
Ulti-Mate5626
Accent-Zed5426
Azzuri3224
Scandina+2522
Mayday1917
CPC1317
Honeydew1017
Acacia918
Glisten429
Average2921

Practice Questions

Do most brands in the table follow a Double Jeopardy pattern?    

Yes. The SCR of brands at the top of the table is generally higher than the SCR of brands at the bottom of the table.

Can you identify any major deviations from the expected pattern? (Note: Deviations of a couple of % are not managerially important here.)    

Glisten has the lowest penetration. Therefore we would expect it to have the lowest SCR. However, this is not the case. Its SCR is equivalent to a much larger brand. Otherwise there are no major deviations.

Previous Page
Next Page

How often do people buy each brand?

Now we are going to look at how often people buy each brand. To do this we look at the distribution of buying frequencies. A buying frequency distribution shows how many households buy the brand zero times, once, twice, three times etc. This is important as it tells you how often your customers are interacting with the brand. A household that buys it six times a year is in the market for the brand about once every two months. However, a household that only purchases it once very rarely interacts with the brand. Let’s have a look at some data showing the percent of households purchasing Scandina in a year:

Tip: Typical is not the average, but rather what is common amongst most households.

 

Table 16: % of households buying Scandina

2009% purchasing
Zero44
Once20
Twice12
Three times8
Four times5
Five times3
Six times3
Seven times2
Eight times1
Nine times1
Ten + times4

Practice Questions

How many times does the typical customer of this brand buy it?    

The typical customer of a brand buys it once or twice a year.

Note: This is normal for most brands, even the big ones
Previous Page
Next Page

Here are some examples of purchase frequency distributions for the bigger brands. You will see that the pattern is the same across the brands.

Table17: % of households buying (five biggest brands)

2009ScandinaUlti-Mate UltraRay-DrySphynx Roll-onUlti-Mate 24Average
Zero423943425644
Once192021191719
Twice11121111811
Three times687957
Four times555635
Five times343323
Six times322312
Seven times222212
Eight + times111211
Nine times111111
Ten + times433323
Even big brands have the majority of households only buying them one time per year
Previous Page
Next Page

The End.

That’s it! By now you should:

  • Understand the key BPMs and how they are calculated
  • Know how to organise and present your BPMs
  • See expected patterns so you know what is normal for your data
  • Be able to spot deviations in the data, which can help you uncover insights into specific brands
  • Know about the Double Jeopardy Law and understand most BPM’s follow this pattern
  • Understand how key BPMs vary across brands in a market
  • Know that the majority of a brand’s customers buy it quite infrequently

 

Click here for a print-ready pdf of key BPM calculations. Thank you for taking the time to participate in the Mining Panel Data for Insights course!  We hope you enjoyed the experience, and learnt from it as well. If you have any feedback or suggestions then please email them to: info@marketingscience.info If you are excited by this, or found it too easy, then there are some more advanced analyses you can do with panel data.

 

We recommend you look to the following reports for suggestions:

  1. Quantifying the sales from your heavy buyers
  2. Examining brand competition and how brands share customers
  3. Dynamic analysis of growth and decline
Previous Page
Content from the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute website for Corporate Sponsors: https://sponsors.marketingscience.info
This content is exclusively for the use of members of the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute Corporate Sponsorship Program.

Can’t find what you are looking for? or have some feedback about the site?                  Contact Us

FOLLOW US

Contact

Phone: +61 8 8302 0111 Postal Address:
GPO Box 2471
Adelaide SA 5001
Australia
Freecall: 1800 801 857 (within Australia) Fax: +61 8 8302 0123 Email: info@MarketingScience.info

Sitemap

  • Home
  • About the Institute
  • Awards and Accolades
  • Ehrenberg-Bass Sponsorship
  • Specialist Research Services
  • News & Media
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimers, Privacy & Copyright

Corporate Sponsors Member’s Area

  • Sponsor Website Home
  • Online Courses
  • Ask us a Question
  • Buy Books
  • Research Services

Corporate Sponsors Member’s Area

  • Sponsor Website Home
  • Online Courses
  • Ask us a Question
  • Buy Books
  • Research Services
image-description

Now available as an eBook exclusively to Apple iBooks

image-description

The Ehrenberg-Bass Institute for Marketing Science is the world’s largest centre for research into marketing. Our team of market research experts can help you grow your brand and develop a culture of evidence-based marketing.

Acknowledgement of Country

Ehrenberg-Bass Institute acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the lands across Australia as the continuing custodians of Country and Culture. We pay our respect to First Nations people and their Elders, past and present.

University of south Australia

The Ehrenberg-Bass Institute is based at the University of South Australia

Website designed & developed by

Website designed & developed by Atomix